Today's interesting Guardian article? Lord Steyn's
essay on democracy, justice and creeping authoritarianism. He lays out the basic idea that both democracy and judicial independence are necessary in order to avoid tyrannical excess, arguing that the independence of the judiciary in England and Wales is even more important given the recent (i.e. over the last 25 years) trend towards large political majorities.
Steyn cites in defence of his claim that judicial independence might be undermined, Charles Clarke's
attempts to discuss matters of principle with the Law Lords, something that appears typical of a government that has failed to understand that politicians and judges are not necessarily on the same side. Also referenced is the worrying Asylum and Immigration Act (2004), which explicitly excludes participants from obtaining a judicial review of their case. As Steyn says, if this act is successful in its attempt "
to immunise manifest illegality", it could serve a model for other areas of the law and could have damaging implications for democracy.
Conclusions? A cogent, crunchy article, well worth the read.