Joan Aiken is the first writer whose name really stuck in my mind. I remember falling in love with
A Necklace of Raindrops, with its beautiful Jan Pienkowski illustrations, when it was read to me as a child. And I remember adoring the
The Wolves of Willoughby Chase when I first read it and on every subsequent reading. But, not having it read it since junior school, I was more than a little worried about how it would stand up to a re-reading. Happily it only took a handful of pages for me to realise that it was even better than I remembered, especially with 30+ years of reading to help me pick out some of the literary featured that had passed me by as a child.
The story opens with a series of arrivals and departures at Willoughby Chase: Sir Willoughby and Lady Green are about to depart on a trip round the world to restore Lady Green's health; Sylvia, Sir Willoughby's niece, has left her elderly aunt in London to keep her headstrong cousin Bonnie company at the Chase; and Miss Slighcarp, a distant cousin of the family, has arrived to act as governess to the children while Bonnie's parents are away.
But no sooner has the Green's ship sailed and promptly been wreaked leaving Bonnie an orphan, than Miss Slighcarp and her dubious assistant Mr Grimshaw pay discharge most of the Chase's servants and dispatch the children off to Mrs Brisket's harsh school in nearby Blastburn. Unwilling to tolerate the appalling conditions Bonnie hatches a plan with Simon, a young goose keeper who lives in a cave in the grounds of the Chase, to escape and travel to London to regain control of her inheritance with the help of her Aunt Jane and Sir Willoughby's man of business.
Re-reading the book, I was struck by Aiken's great skill and economy. The book is short — less than two hundred pages — and action packed, but at the same time, it doesn't lack for characterisation or world-building. Most of this, I suspect, is due to Aiken's deft ability to create scenes that manage to achieve all three aims at once.
Thus the unpleasantness of Miss Slighcarp is immediately established when she hits the loyal Pattern with a hairbrush; Bonnie's impulsiveness and temper are apparent in her response — she throws the brush out of the window and dashes a pitcher of water in her new governess' face; and we're shown that some greater villainy may be afoot in Miss Slighcarp's over-reaction to Pattern's attempt to unpack her letter case — because who overreacts to the handling of their papers except someone with something to hide?
Similarly Sylvia's train journey north from London serves multiple roles: it establishes Sylvia's quiet character and the more conventional manners drilled into her by Aunt Jane; it introduces the shifty Josiah Grimshaw who, despite saving Sylvia when a wolf breaks the window, clearly spends much of the journey trying to butter her up in the hope of getting himself invited to the Chase; and it also does a lot of world building, making it clear just how far Willoughby Chase is from London — a day and a half — while the relatively crude train serves to fix the period of the piece in the early- to mid- 19th century.
Returning to the book again after reading Wilkie Collins and Sheridan Le Fanu in the intervening period, it's clear that Aiken is working within a framework that borrows heavily from 19th century gothic and sensation novels. Thus both the young heroines are orphans — Sylvia from the outset; Bonnie from almost immediately after her parents departure — and find themselves quickly stuck with a sinister guardian in the vein of Silas Ruthyn or Percival Glyde, who wants nothing quite so much as to separate them from their rightful inheritance.
It's interesting how Aiken's heroines mirror Wilkie Collins' two leads in
The Woman in White. Bonnie is dark, active, and tomboyish just as Marion Halcombe is is, while Sylvia mirrors Laura Fairlie by being fair, feminine, and elegant — and also by catching cold in the school, but this is more a consequence of being forced to work in the laundry than anything else. But unlike Collins' heroines, they don't need a hero look after them for all Simon's
I was also struck by the sheer sadness of Aunt Jane's character — something I hadn't entirely noticed before. From the very outset, as she cuts up their flat's precious draperies to convert them into a new wardrobe for Sylvia, it's clear that Jane thinks that she hasn't got much to live for now that she no longer has to care for her beloved niece and that she's handing on her dearest possessions to the next generation. And where, when the children arrive in London to find her almost dead, I'd previously assumed that her malnutrition was due to poverty, it's now painfully clear that she has chosen to starve herself to death — because, logically, without Sylvia to feed and with the same income available to her, she actually have more to spend on food rather than less. But at least Jane recovers well enough from her ordeal — inspired as much by seeing her nieces as by Dr Field's champagne — to take charge of the former pupils of Mrs Brisket's school even, as an aside points out, managing to reform Mrs Brisket's lying and bullying daughter Diana.
In summary: a nostalgic treat that is as much of a delight now as it was all those years ago.