sawyl: (A self portrait)
Quote of the week via Rachel Manija Brown's piece on self-publishing over on Charlie Stross' blog:

A number of writers are doing quite well selling short erotic stories for between 99 cents and $2.99. The latter may seem outrageous if you think of it as the price of a short story. It's less so if you think of it as the price of an orgasm.

The whole article is a really interesting read, not least because it explains the subtle dance authors have to carry out when putting up their self-published porn in order to ensure that interested readers can find something that matches their precise tastes without using any forbidden terms on the cover material:

Marketing on Amazon is done largely by inputting keywords when uploading your book. Keywords and phrases are search terms readers use. For instance, "gay young adult novel" or "strong female characters" or "zombie steampunk." In erotica, you can use the real terms in keywords even if they're banned from blurbs. So if you go to Amazon and type in the banned word "orgy," you'll get books that used that as a keyword but have discreet titles like The Arrangement. (Or less discreet titles that at least don't include "orgy.")

Amazon is aware of this, of course. It seems that they're less interested in outright banning all erotica than in banning certain types and in keeping a virtual brown paper wrapper over graphic language visible in the storefront.

Call me as out of touch as a high court judge, but I had no idea dinosaur erotica was a thing until I read about it in a Guardian books post and now I know, I'm not sure whether it is something I wish my wife or my servants to read or not...

sawyl: (Default)
Having been reminded that Alexander Armstrong was on R3 on Monday here's one of A&M's delightfully obscene Flanders and Swann homages:

Let the raciness begin... )

Sadly Brabbins and Fyffe were deemed far too filthy for Radio 3 on a weekday morning, more's the pity, so they went instead for Armstrong's rather nice recording of Stanford's Nunc Dimittis in G from his university days.
sawyl: (Default)
According to today's Bad Science, The Sun, irony of ironies, is having conniptions over the NHS's provision of pornography in fertility clinics. After dealing with the complaint in short order — the average spend is twenty quid per trust per year — Dr Ben investigates the more interesting question of whether there might be valid scientific reasons for provided, um, performance enhancers:

But it gets more interesting. There is already evidence from animal research that males increase the amount of sperm in their ejaculate when there is more competition around. In 2005, Kilgallon and Simmons conducted an experiment to see whether human males viewing “images depicting sperm competition” also had a higher percentage of motile sperm in their ejaculates.

God knows what the right wing press would make out of the grant proposal for this bit of research...

sawyl: (Default)
Via Jenny Davidson, a salutary warning from the Indy about the dangers of not doing a background check when hiring out your stately home for the night:

Last weekend, employees at the 17th-century manor house, which is accustomed to hosting corporate dos and chocolate-box weddings for well-heeled clients, were left speechless when 350 masked guests stripped off at the stroke of midnight and engaged in group sex of bacchanalian proportions.

According to those who witnessed the spectacle, security guards gave up trying to persuade copulating couples to go to their rooms because almost every guest at the party was "otherwise engaged" with a fellow reveller.

How embarrassing...

sawyl: (Default)
This is somewhat bizarre: the American pornography industry is asking for billions of dollars to help it through it's current sag:

Flynt and Francis, who say that adult DVD sales have dived 22% over the last year, argue that they, too, deserve a helping hand.

"Congress seems willing to help shore up our nation's most important businesses [and] we feel we deserve the same consideration," Francis said in a statement.

"In difficult economic times Americans turn to entertainment for relief. More and more, the kind of entertainment they turn to is adult entertainment."

Owen Moogan, a spokesman for Flynt, told CNN: "The take here is that everyone and their mother want to be bailed out, from the banks to the big three.

"The porn industry has been hurt by the downturn like everyone else and they are going to ask for the $5bn. Is it the most serious thing in the world? Is it going to make the lives of Americans better if it happens? It is not for them to determine."

Initially I thought this was a spoof, a la Julian Gough in the NYT, but I'm starting to wonder whether the pornographers might actually be in earnest...

sawyl: (Default)
This, from an article on the Joy of Sex in today's Guardian, made me snigger like a schoolboy:

The first edition of the Joy of Sex considered sex on moving motorbikes. "If you have access to a private road, the hazards are yours," counselled the book's ironically surnamed author Dr Alex Comfort. Thirty-six years and 8m copies in 22 languages later, that passage has been excised from the New Joy of Sex. Funless if sensible safety legislation has since made sex on moving motorbikes illegal. Doing it on horseback (as mentioned in the 1972 edition) is also outlawed. So stop that too.

If you'll excuse me, I'm off to cancel my next riding lesson...

sawyl: (Default)
Here's Mary Roach, in an excerpt from her book, Bonk, describing the process of having sex whilst being ultra-sounded by Jing Deng, a medical physicist from UCL:

"Regarding the position..." he says when we return in our hospital gowns. He wants us on our sides, spoons-style. "I think facing the wall is better," Deng says. As opposed to facing him. "That will be more romantic," he adds. On the wall, someone has hung a painting of a hillside harbour town. As though by looking at it we could convince ourselves that we were on the Amalfi Coast - or, just as good, that Deng was. "And I will switch off the lights."

"Where are the candles and soft music?" Ed asks.

"Oh, I am sorry," Deng says, straight-faced, chagrined. Then he brightens. "I can turn on my laptop. I have the soundtrack to Les Mis." His efforts are sweet, though pointless. There is no way to make this situation romantic, normal, sexual.

Deng goes next door and returns with an envelope, which he hands to Ed. Inside is a copy of Maxim. "This is very erotic," he assures Ed. The implication being, I suppose, that the sight of one's wife in a baggy, knee-length hospital gown and threadbare socks is not.

Well, at least they eschewed the offer of Les Mis as more of a mood killer than a scientist with a probulator...

sawyl: (Default)
Continuing today's biological theme, have you ever wondered what happens when a great racehorse is put out to stud and turns out not to be terribly interested in shagging? Well, wonder no more, thanks to this piece in the Times:

"We tried everything," Tsunoda said. "War Emblem, everyone, were physically and mentally exhausted."

Still, there was little reason to panic because young stallions fresh from the racetrack are sometimes slow to embrace their new life. The 1977 Triple Crown winner, Seattle Slew, was another notable racehorse who was reluctant to mate in his first year as a stud.

In his second season, Shadai took no chances and tried a host of tactics to make War Emblem a working stallion. They presented nearly 500 mares to him, often letting him pick from a dozen or so paraded before him. "He was very particular about who he liked," Tsunoda said.

War Emblem was enamored of certain mares more than others and so an elaborate bait-and-switch ballet became part of the mating ritual. Shadai let War Emblem's favorite mares get his attention, then they switched them out for a mare he had previously disliked.

I don't know about you, but I really don't like the idea that they tried everything. It sounds disturbingly reminiscent of the whole monkey fluffing thing from a few years ago...

sawyl: (Default)
Nothing particularly exciting to mention today, other than a ritual visit by [livejournal.com profile] silvershooter. So instead I'm going to quote the first paragraph from an article in Sunday's Indy, in which Rupert Smith describes how he fell into writing porn:

A few years ago, I was complaining to a fellow writer about my inability to find a publisher for my second novel. It was a fairly typical outpouring of frustration and incomprehension at the state of British publishing. "Have you ever thought of writing porn?" he asked. "It's easy to get published, and you sell a lot of books." As these are the only words that a writer ever really wants to hear, I rushed home and embarked without much thought on a filthy homosexual rewrite of Robert Louis Stevenson's Kidnapped, entitled The Low Road.

Why couldn't he have written a porn version of Catriona? I mean. We all want to know what really happens between David and Miss Grant, plus, the whole Alan Breck, James More thing? It's got dodgy slash potential coming out of the wherever. Actually, now that I think about it, I can't quite recall whether Alan and James every actually meet up — it's been 20+ years since I last read Catriona — but I seem to remember something about A running off with J's portmanteau, which, blimey, sounds pretty damned filthy to me...

sawyl: (Default)
I rather liked this little simile from a post on the Guardian books blog:

It was offering advertising teams a free space for one of their companies on the back of a tube ticket. The advert will be on travel passes for people using the Underground, we are told repeatedly, the capitalisation jarring the tone of the sentence like the come-on lines of a malfunctioning sex droid: "Yes, we will Sex now sir as you are Great of the Writers."

Which rather makes one wonder, what sort of seductive magic might flow from the mouth-style orifice of a fully operational sex droid?

sawyl: (Default)
A wonderful quote from [livejournal.com profile] matociquala's post on the subject of literary sex:

Sex is not effortless. Nor is it necessarily a complete mess every time it happens, unless you're stuck with somebody who can't read signals or carry off teamwork. (Hint: Before you sleep with somebody, get them to help you move a large piece of furniture. This will tell you a great deal about whether you really want to go there or not.)

I hate to think what this says about Richard McDuff...

sawyl: (Default)
I was reading through a piece on the Guardian books blog, when inspiration hit: why not solve the bad sex problem by moving all the smut to the end of the book?

Have you ever read a novel — soi-disant porn doesn't count — where the pacing of the story suffers, despite a decent plot, because of the author's tendency to stop every 20 pages and insert a gratuitous sex scene? What would happen if, instead of breaking the story for an episode of needless lustage, the author were to simply refer the reader to an appropriate section of filth in the appendix?

It seems to me that everyone wins. The author works his — I use the pronoun advisedly — frustration out, banging out a bit of fulsome erotica. The reader gets an plot unbroken by inordinate boinkage, with the option of extra sex if required or desired. The dedicated filth monger knows exactly where to find the beast making two backs, without having to waste time skimming through all that prose, whilst the moral crusader knows exactly which pages need to be redacted to protect the pure of mind.

It's such a great idea. How can it not work?
sawyl: (Default)
Via denailism via pharyngula — I just want to stress that I don't go out looking for this sort of stuff — I found this quite astonishing account of a pivotal moment in the history of the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

A word of warning though: don't try to read this in public unless you want to spend time explaining to your family, friends and colleagues why you're laughing hysterically.

Are you sitting comfortably? No? Then I'll begin... )

Talk about pioneering!

sawyl: (Default)
Why, exactly, did Blue Peter decide that Cookie was an unsuitable name for their cat? It's nothing compared to Springfield Elementary's Butthead Auditorium...
Updated: Marina Hyde suggests possible answer:

Some say there was a late run on Cookie, which was suggestive of suspicious voting patterns. Others maintain that "cookie" can be a slang term for the female genitalia. One might venture that, attended by a judicious wink or raise of the eyebrow, almost every noun in the English language could have been taken as a slang term for genitalia in some arcane patois at one time or another.

All of which suggests that certain members of the BBC need to go back to the archives and reacquaint themselves with the oeuvres — that's your actual French, that is — of J. Peasemold Gruntfuttock, Rambling Sid Rumpo et al.

sawyl: (Default)
A couple of weeks ago, it was John Crace's amusing abridgment version of Sleeping Around. Today it was Lucy Mangan's analysis of the latest guides to sex aimed at the cash rich, time poor. It seems as though it is no longer possible to lay open a venerable organ like the Guardian without discovering a veritable cloaca of filth. In order to demonstrate my disapproval, here's a particularly amusing quote from La Mangan:

You could, alternatively, move to Australia. It worked for our Barbara: "I began using several of my favourite tantric techniques to circulate sexual energy between me and Sydney. Before I knew it, a little blissgasm shivered up my spine, followed by an actual clitoral orgasm ... I was so amazed, I had to stop and lean against a wall." The tantric beginner is advised to start off slowly, perhaps with a short walk through Filey and a good cough.

I wonder where on the scale of difficulty expectorating in Exmouth falls? Answers please, on a post card, to Kenneth Horne, 78 North Horseposture Road...

sawyl: (Default)
Denis MacShane, in his enthusiastic review of Rites of Peace by Adam Zamoyski, notes describes the primary method of diplomatic negotiation used in 1815: the revenge shag. Thus, he says:

Zamoyski almost loses count of the number Metternich slept with. Talleyrand did an Alan Clark by sleeping with a mother and her daughter. Tsar Alexander took his revenge on Metternich (who opposed the Russian desire to incorporate Poland as a Russian province) by sleeping with his mistress.

Before wryly commenting:

Such S&F diplomacy was hard work. Alas from my years as a Foreign Office minister, it seems such fun is rarely had by diplomats today, except in outlying posts such as Uzbekistan.

Sounds surprisingly readable, for a book on diplomacy...

sawyl: (Default)
Some people will do anything to differentiate themselves from their competitors. Witness the following, from today's Graun:

Word reaches us that the sheer glut of coffee houses in Seattle, home of Starbucks, has led to some unorthodox new sales techniques, dubbed "Sexpresso". Waitresses have been donning bikinis, lingerie or fetish outfits, while the drinks have been given "sexy" new names. Two points, really. One, is anyone really tempted to drink a coffee/white chocolate mix called a "Wet Dream"? Two, isn't the easiest way to sell more coffee just to make a better brew?

I wonder if they got the idea from Mike Judge's Idiocracy, a film set in the year 2505, where, "every commercial transaction has been sexualised: at Starbucks you can get coffee plus a handjob (or a "full body" latte)." Talk about progress: in less than a year, reality has managed to do what fiction thought would take 498 years to achieve...

sawyl: (Default)
On the day that the Graun carried an article on the annoying noisiness of the UK, I overheard or rather simply heard, for I could hardly have failed to hear given the volume at which it was said, the following exchange:

First Person: What? You've picked up a 20 year old bird?
Second Person: [Sounding completely awed] That's amazing
Third Person: [Mumblingly confirms the fact]
First Person: Cradle snatcher! You'll never be able to keep up. She'll kill you!

Unfortunately, this sort of thing is typical of the archivistas — they seem to have something of a unique talent for disruption.

Falconer

Aug. 21st, 2006 08:30 pm
sawyl: (Default)
The funniest, filthiest thing I've read for quite some time. Probably since I last read something by Warren, actually.

For the nervous, it's definitely not suitable for reading at work, in mixed company, or in bible study class. I bet you're wishing you hadn't clicked on the link right about now aren't you? Well? Aren't you punk?
sawyl: (Default)
While listening to Virgins and Virginals on Between the Ears — well worth checking out, even if you're not into history, for the combination of Will Gregory and Sophie Yates — I encountered the following quote about Dr John Bull who was:

"As famous for the marring of virginity as he was for the fingering of organs and virginals."

Or at least that's the way the Archbishop of Canterbury saw it. Somehow it's hard to imagine the current Primate of All England directing quite such dodgy double entendre at anyone, let alone a musician. I guess it just goes to show how much the church has changed.

Profile

sawyl: (Default)
sawyl

August 2018

S M T W T F S
   123 4
5 6 7 8910 11
12131415161718
192021222324 25
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 09:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios